SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael A. Cabotaje

Last decided San RafaelJul 2026
Decisions 2,428since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Michael A. Cabotaje's 62% approval rate since 2017 sits within the 43% to 79% range of the San Rafael bench's records. In the most recent reporting period, his 59% approval rate compares to the office's 61%, the state's 61%, and the national average of 58%. These figures rely on a significant docket of 2,428 decisions on record since 2017. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 2,428
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Cabotaje San Rafael National
Approval rate 59% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 55% — —
Denials 41% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cabotaje's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cabotaje
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Michael A. Cabotaje has fluctuated since 2017, showing a rise from 50% in 2017 to a peak of 78% in 2023 before moderating to 61% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 2,428 decisions on record, this pattern reflects a judge who has navigated varying case volumes and evidence standards. The latest-period approval rate of 59% is slightly lower than the long-term average, reflecting recent shifts in the types of cases or evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cabotaje's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Rafael hearing office

Michael A. Cabotaje's most recent office on record is the San Rafael hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the local region in California, maintaining a bench of 8 judges with varying approval patterns. You can expect a standard hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in a decision. You can see the San Rafael Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Rafael

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge assigned to your hearing is essentially random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Rafael office, with 4 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 43% to 79% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions