SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James S. Carletti

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the San Diego Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 2,392 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Carletti?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Carletti maintains a lifetime approval rate of 51%, which tracks 6 points below the San Diego office average and 7 points below the national average. These figures are derived from 2,392 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Carletti San Diego National
Approval rate 51% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 43%
Denials 49%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Carletti's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Carletti
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 2 years on the bench, Judge Carletti has shown a steady trend in his approval patterns. His annual approval rate moved from 49% in 2016 to 54% in 2017, reflecting a consistent approach to case evaluation. This trajectory suggests a stable decision-making process that has remained predictable throughout his tenure. You can find more information on the San Diego Hearing Office page.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Carletti's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Carletti? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Diego hearing office

The San Diego Hearing Office serves a large population across Southern California, managing a high volume of disability claims. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains an average approval rate of 57%, reflecting the complex nature of the cases heard in this region. You can see the San Diego Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the San Diego office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs range from 38% to 68%. This variance highlights why preparation is essential regardless of your specific assignment. You can view the full roster of judges at the San Diego Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions