SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sherrill A. L. Carvalho

Last decided Fort WorthJul 2026
Decisions 4,137since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's overall approval rate on record since 2016 is 51%, recent data shows a 58% approval rate during the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 4 points above the office average of 54% and 2 points above the state average of 56%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for recent activity, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 4,137
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Carvalho Fort Worth National
Approval rate 58% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 48% — —
Denials 42% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Carvalho's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Carvalho
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Sherrill A. L. Carvalho has fluctuated since 2016. After a low of 42% in 2021, the approval rate rose to 61% in 2024 before reaching 58% in the most recent fiscal year. With 4,137 total decisions on record, the recent 58% approval rate indicates a shift from the long-term average. This recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Carvalho's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Worth hearing office

The Fort Worth Hearing Office is the most recent office on record for Sherrill A. L. Carvalho as of July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, reflecting a diverse range of decision-making patterns. You can see the Fort Worth Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Fort Worth

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases here in SSA's latest file. Approval rates across this bench range from 32% to 63% based on records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions