SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Darren Hamner

Last decided Fort WorthJul 2026
Decisions 4,622since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Hamner has a 52% approval rate since 2016, recent data shows a 62% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 8 points above the Fort Worth office average of 54%, 6 points above the Texas state average of 56%, and 4 points above the national average of 58%. These figures reflect recent trends rather than the judge's entire record.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 4,622
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hamner Fort Worth National
Approval rate 62% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 53% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hamner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hamner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Hamner's approval trend has shown an upward trajectory. After starting at 42% in 2016, the annual approval rate has climbed, reaching 64% in 2025 and holding at 62% during the partial 2026 fiscal year. This pattern indicates a shift in decision outcomes over the last decade, suggesting that your current hearing environment differs from the earlier years of the recorded window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hamner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Worth hearing office

The Fort Worth hearing office serves claimants across Texas. With 15 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 54%. You can expect a review of your medical evidence and vocational history at this location. You can see the Fort Worth Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Fort Worth

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Fort Worth hearing office. Approval rates among this bench range from 32% to 63% since 2016. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions