Earl C. Cates Jr. has an approval rate of 48% across 1,088 decisions on record since January 2016. His most recent office on record is the Phoenix North hearing office, where he concluded his recorded activity in September 2020. Because case assignment is random, your hearing outcome depends on the specific evidence you present. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for Earl C. Cates Jr. is 48% based on 1,088 decisions recorded between January 2016 and September 2020. When compared to the broader bench at the Phoenix North office, where judges range from 28% to 72% in their approval rates, this figure provides a baseline for understanding past judicial patterns. These statistics are derived from Social Security Administration records to provide transparency for your claim.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Cates Jr.. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cates Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Earl C. Cates Jr. fluctuated throughout the data window starting in 2016. After an initial period of relative stability, the rate shifted in 2018 before declining in 2019 and rising in 2020. With 1,088 total decisions on record, the data reflects a varied approach to case adjudication over the four-year period. These yearly changes may reflect shifts in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented in specific years.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cates Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Phoenix North hearing office
The Phoenix North hearing office serves claimants in Arizona and is part of a regional network of offices handling SSDI claims. As of the most recent record in September 2020, the office bench included 12 judges who have contributed to the local docket. You can expect a formal proceeding where your medical and vocational evidence is reviewed in detail.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Phoenix North
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Phoenix North office, there are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, with individual approval rates ranging from 28% to 72%. This variance highlights the importance of thorough case preparation regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Earl C. Cates Jr. has an approval rate of 48% on record since 2016. This falls within the 28% to 72% range observed among the 12 judges whose most recent office on record is Phoenix North. An attorney can help you understand how to present your medical evidence effectively for this judge.
Yes, the approval rate for Earl C. Cates Jr. has varied annually, ranging from a low of 43% in 2019 to a high of 62% in 2020. These fluctuations are common in SSDI hearings and often depend on the specific mix of cases and evidence quality. A qualified attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency across hearing offices. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is vital to have a strong, well-documented case prepared by an attorney.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records and hears your testimony. You may be questioned by the judge or a vocational expert regarding your ability to perform work. Having an attorney by your side can help ensure your testimony is clear and your medical evidence is properly highlighted.




