Eliaser Chaparro is an ALJ at the Little Rock office. Over 10 years on the bench and 25,427 lifetime decisions, 46% have been approved. This is 5 points above the local office average. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Chaparro has maintained a 46% approval rate across 25,427 lifetime decisions during his 10-year tenure. In the most recent reporting period, his 45% approval rate sits 5 percentage points above the Little Rock office average, though it remains below the national average of 58%. This data provides a statistical baseline for understanding how cases are processed at this office.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Chaparro's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over the last decade, your judge's approval rate has shown notable variation, peaking at 57% in 2016 before trending toward a lower range in the early 2020s. Recent data from 2024 and 2025 shows a stabilization, with the judge approving cases at rates closer to his long-term average. This pattern suggests that while the judge's approach has evolved, recent decisions reflect a consistent application of current standards.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Chaparro's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Chaparro? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Little Rock hearing office
The Little Rock Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Arkansas, managing a high volume of disability cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 41%, reflecting the broader regional trends in disability adjudication. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical and vocational evidence.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Little Rock office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 27% to 52%, highlighting the diversity of decision-making styles you may encounter. Regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain the same.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
