SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Laura Chess

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Mt Pleasant MI Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 25,804 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Chess?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both their long-term history and recent trends. Judge Chess maintains a 63% lifetime approval rate, which remains competitive against the latest national average of 58%. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded a 67% approval rate. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Chess Mt Pleasant MI National
Approval rate 63% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 33%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Chess's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Chess
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, the approval pattern for Judge Chess has shown a notable upward trend. After hovering near 60% for much of the previous decade, the rate climbed to 70% in 2024 and remains at 69% in 2025. This shift indicates a recent period of higher allowance frequency compared to the earlier years of the judge's career.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Chess's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Chess? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mt Pleasant MI hearing office

The MT Pleasant MI Hearing Office serves a broad population across Michigan, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a consistent workflow to address the regional backlog of cases. The office currently reports a 66% latest-period approval rate, reflecting the local environment for disability adjudication.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the MT Pleasant MI Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 55% to 63%. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical documentation is the most effective way to prepare.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions