SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. JoErin O'Leary

Last decided Mt Pleasant MIJul 2026
Decisions 4,020since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While JoErin O'Leary has a 63% approval rate since 2016, recent performance shows a 67% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 2 points above the office average of 65%, 7 points above the state average of 60%, and 9 points above the national average of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 4,020
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge O'Leary Mt Pleasant MI National
Approval rate 67% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 59% — —
Denials 33% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge O'Leary's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge O'Leary
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for JoErin O'Leary has shown movement since 2016. After a period of relative stability, the data indicates an upward shift in approval frequency, peaking in 2024 before moderating in the most recent fiscal year-to-date figures. With 4,020 total decisions on record, this pattern reflects a consistent approach to case evaluation. The latest period suggests a continuation of this trend, which may be influenced by changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge O'Leary's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mt Pleasant MI hearing office

The most recent office on record for JoErin O'Leary is the MT Pleasant MI hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 8 judges. The office-wide approval rate for the latest period was 65%, providing a benchmark for the local judicial environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Mt Pleasant MI

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest file. Approval rates among this bench range from 30% to 63% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions