SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Christine A. Cooke

Last decided Kansas CityJul 2026
Decisions 3,136since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Christine A. Cooke's performance involves looking at both long-term records and recent trends. Her 53% approval rate since 2016 sits within the 33% to 77% range observed among the bench at the Kansas City hearing office. In the most recent reporting period, Christine A. Cooke's 19% approval rate differs from the office-wide 56% rate. These figures are based on a docket of 3,136 decisions on record.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 3,136
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Cooke Kansas City National
Approval rate 19% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 14% — —
Denials 81% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cooke's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cooke
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Christine A. Cooke's approval rate has shown variance since 2016. While the rate remained between 47% and 60% for most of the period, the most recent fiscal year-to-date data shows a 19% approval rate over 21 decisions. This recent shift represents a departure from the historical average on record. Such fluctuations in the latest period may reflect changes in case mix or the specific evidence presented in those recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cooke's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kansas City hearing office

The Kansas City hearing office serves you and other claimants across Missouri and the surrounding region. With 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office manages a significant volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 56%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Kansas City

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Kansas City hearing office, 12 of whom decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 33% to 77% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions