SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul Coulter

Last decided NorwalkJul 2026
Decisions 3,639since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Paul Coulter are calculated based on 3,639 decisions recorded between January 2016 and July 2026. This volume of data provides a view of the judge's decision patterns compared to the 50% to 78% range observed among other judges whose most recent office on record is the Norwalk hearing office. While latest-period metrics offer a snapshot of recent activity, they should be viewed alongside the long-term record.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 3,639
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Coulter Norwalk National
Approval rate 63% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 50% — —
Denials 37% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Coulter's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Coulter
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Paul Coulter has seen fluctuations in approval rates, beginning at 53% and reaching 63% in the partial 2026 fiscal year data. The trend has remained relatively steady, with yearly variations between 52% and 60% over the last decade. The most recent reporting period shows a 63% approval rate, which is 4 percentage points lower than the office-wide average for that same period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Coulter's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norwalk hearing office

The most recent office on record for Paul Coulter is the Norwalk hearing office, which serves the California region. This office hosts a bench of 7 judges with varying approval rates, and the office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 67%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Norwalk

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is the Norwalk hearing office, and 4 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 50% to 78% based on records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions