SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul Coulter

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Norwalk Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,428 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Coulter?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Coulter has maintained a 57% lifetime approval rate over a decade of service. This figure is compared against the Norwalk Hearing Office latest rate of 66% and the national average of 58%. With 22,428 lifetime decisions, the data provides a stable view of past outcomes. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Coulter Norwalk National
Approval rate 57% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 43%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Coulter's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Coulter
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, your judge has seen approval rates fluctuate between 53% and 61%. The trend shows a period of stability between 2019 and 2020 at 60%, followed by recent years where the rate has held near the lifetime average. The latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 57%, which reflects a continuation of this steady pattern. These shifts often mirror changes in the complexity of cases or the medical evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Coulter's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Coulter? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norwalk hearing office

The Norwalk Hearing Office serves you throughout the region, managing a high volume of cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently reports an approval rate of 66%, which is higher than the state average of 59%. You can expect a professional environment focused on the thorough review of medical records and testimony. Visit the Norwalk Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Across the Norwalk Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 50% to 78%. This variance highlights why it is important to focus on the strength of your own medical evidence. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions