SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tom Duann

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,331 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Tom Duann reflect a significant volume of cases heard since 2016. When comparing his latest-period performance to the broader bench, he sits 8 percentage points above the Norwalk office average, 14 points above the state average, and 17 points above the national average. These figures are based on the most recent reporting period to ensure a like-for-like comparison. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 4,331
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Duann Norwalk National
Approval rate 75% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 64%
Denials 25%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Duann's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Duann
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval record for Tom Duann has shown a steady upward trend. After starting at 60% in 2016, the rate has gradually increased, reaching 75% in the most recent reporting period. This pattern suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence over his 4,331 lifetime decisions. The recent uptick in approvals reflects a continuation of this steady pattern rather than a sudden shift in judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Duann's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norwalk hearing office

The Norwalk hearing office serves you throughout the region, maintaining a bench of experienced ALJs. The office currently reports a latest-period approval rate of 67%. You should focus on organizing medical documentation that directly addresses the criteria in 20 CFR Part 404. You can see the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/norwalk-CA Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 7 judges on record at the Norwalk office since 2016, 4 of whom reported in the latest period. Lifetime approval rates across this bench range from 50% to 78%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions