SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tom Duann

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Norwalk Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 25,871 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Duann?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Duann maintains a lifetime approval rate of 67%, which stands in contrast to the 59% state average and the 58% national average. With a career spanning 10 years and 25,871 decisions, this data reflects a significant volume of case history. These rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific outcome.

Metric Judge Duann Norwalk National
Approval rate 67% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 69%
Denials 26%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Duann's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Duann
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10-year tenure, Judge Duann has shown a consistent trend in his adjudication patterns. While his approval rate fluctuated in his early years, the data shows a steady upward trajectory since 2019, culminating in a 74% approval rate during the most recent period. This recent performance indicates a slight increase compared to his long-term lifetime average. These patterns suggest a stable approach to evidence evaluation, though each case remains unique.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Duann's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Duann? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norwalk hearing office

The Norwalk Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Connecticut and the surrounding region. It is staffed by a team of 6 administrative law judges who manage a high volume of disability claims annually. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 66%, reflecting the regional trends in disability adjudication.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Norwalk Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 50% to 78%. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the quality of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions