SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James J. D'Alessandro

Last decided ManchesterSep 2017
Decisions 472since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for James J. D'Alessandro is based on 472 decisions on record since 2016. This figure provides a statistical baseline when compared to the 26% to 86% range observed among the 11 judges whose most recent office on record is the Manchester hearing office. These data points reflect historical patterns rather than current office-wide benchmarks.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 75%
Decisions on record 472

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge D'Alessandro. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge D'Alessandro's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge D'Alessandro
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for James J. D'Alessandro showed a slight shift between 2016 and 2017. In 2016, the judge recorded a 76% approval rate across 470 decisions, followed by a 72% rate across 131 decisions in 2017. This trend indicates a steady pattern of decision-making over the recorded timeframe.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge D'Alessandro's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Manchester hearing office

The Manchester hearing office serves you and other claimants across New Hampshire and the surrounding region. As of the most recent record in September 2017, this office hosted a bench of 11 judges. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Manchester Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Manchester

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is the Manchester hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 26% to 86% on their since-2016 records. Six of these judges decided cases in the most recent SSA file from July 2026.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions