SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Grant Dail

Last decided Atlanta DowntownJul 2026
Decisions 1,128since 2022

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Understanding how a judge compares to their peers can help you prepare for your hearing. Across the 1,128 decisions on record since December 2022, Grant Dail has maintained an approval rate of 62%. For context, the 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Atlanta Downtown hearing office show a range of approval rates from 23% to 86%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2022
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 1,128
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Dail Atlanta Downtown National
Approval rate 66% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 56% — —
Denials 34% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dail's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dail
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Grant Dail has shown an upward trend. Starting at 58% in 2023, the rate moved to 60% in 2024 and 62% in 2025. In the most recent partial period of 2026, the rate reached 66% across 306 decisions. This latest-period figure matches the Atlanta Downtown office average of 66%, while remaining 9 points higher than the state average and 8 points higher than the national average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dail's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta Downtown hearing office

The Atlanta Downtown hearing office is the most recent office on record for Grant Dail, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. With a bench of 22 judges on record, this office manages a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period is 66%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta Downtown

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Atlanta Downtown hearing office, and 9 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 23% to 86%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions