SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bradley L. Davis

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,165 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While Bradley L. Davis has a 32% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period approval rate is 31%. This compares to an office-wide latest-period rate of 43%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 4,165 lifetime decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 32%
Decisions on record 4,165
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Davis Little Rock National
Approval rate 31% 43% 58%
Fully favorable 21%
Denials 69%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Davis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Davis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval record for Bradley L. Davis has fluctuated since 2016. After reaching 37% in 2021, the rate saw a decline to 25% in 2022 before settling at 31% in the latest period. This pattern suggests that while the judge's approach remains consistent, external factors such as case complexity or evidence quality often influence yearly outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Davis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Little Rock hearing office

The Little Rock hearing office serves claimants throughout Arkansas, operating under the broader SSA regional structure. The office maintains a bench of 16 judges on record, with a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 43%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. For more information, see the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/little-rock-AR Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 8 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, with a lifetime range spanning from 27% to 66%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions