SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kelly Davis

Last decided RaleighSep 2025
Decisions 3,608since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When reviewing approval rates, it is helpful to compare a judge's performance against the broader bench at their most recent office. The 17 judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 27% to 74% on their records since 2016. These figures provide a baseline for understanding the local environment, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 70%
Decisions on record 3,608

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Davis. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Davis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Davis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Kelly Davis has issued 3,608 decisions. The yearly approval trend has remained steady, with minor fluctuations between 65% and 75% over the last decade. While the rate was 73% in 2016 and 69% in 2025, the consistency in these figures suggests a stable approach to case evaluation. This pattern indicates that the judge's decision-making process has remained consistent over the period covered by the available data.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Davis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Raleigh hearing office

Kelly Davis's most recent office on record is the Raleigh hearing office, with decisions there through September 2025. This office serves claimants across North Carolina and is part of a larger regional network. With 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the bench handles a significant volume of SSDI claims. You can see the Raleigh Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh, and their approval rates vary significantly from 27% to 74%. While some judges may have different tendencies, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions