SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Anne-Marie Ofori-Acquaah

Last decided RaleighJul 2026
Decisions 4,012since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Anne-Marie Ofori-Acquaah has a 41% approval rate across her entire record since 2016, her latest-period approval rate is 45%. This is 16 percentage points lower than the Raleigh office's latest-period rate of 61%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for recent activity, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting outcomes for your specific case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 4,012
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Ofori-Acquaah Raleigh National
Approval rate 45% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 39% — —
Denials 55% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ofori-Acquaah's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ofori-Acquaah
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Anne-Marie Ofori-Acquaah has issued 4,012 decisions. Her yearly approval rate has fluctuated, showing a low of 31% in 2021 and a recent high of 48% in 2024. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 45% approval rate. This recent activity reflects a continuation of the varied patterns observed throughout her time on record, suggesting that your case-specific evidence remains the primary driver of outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ofori-Acquaah's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Raleigh hearing office

Anne-Marie Ofori-Acquaah's most recent office on record is the Raleigh hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 17 judges with varying approval patterns. You can expect a standard hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence is the most critical factor in the outcome. You can see the Raleigh Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Raleigh office, there are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 10 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates for this bench range from 27% to 74% since 2016. Preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions