SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paula Wordsworth

Last decided RaleighJul 2026
Decisions 3,953since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. Paula Wordsworth maintains a 68% approval rate on record since 2016, which sits within the 27% to 74% range of her peers at the Raleigh office. In the most recent reporting period, her 68% approval rate outperformed the office average of 61% by 7 percentage points. These figures are based on a significant docket of 3,953 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 3,953
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Wordsworth Raleigh National
Approval rate 68% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 61% — —
Denials 32% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wordsworth's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wordsworth
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Paula Wordsworth has shown a varied trend since 2016. After starting at 68% in 2016, the rate fluctuated, reaching a peak of 75% in 2024 before settling at 68% in the most recent partial fiscal year. With 3,953 total decisions on record, the volume of cases provides a stable view of her decision-making history. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, remaining consistent with her long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wordsworth's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Raleigh hearing office

Paula Wordsworth's most recent office on record is the Raleigh hearing office, which serves you if you are in North Carolina. This office is part of a regional network that handles a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 61%. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your outcome. You can see the Raleigh Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Raleigh office, and 10 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 27% to 74% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions