Keith Dietterle is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Seattle office with a lifetime approval rate of 53% over 8,073 decisions. This sits 5 points below the national average of 58%. While these statistics provide a helpful probability, they are not a prediction for your specific hearing. An experienced attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the evidentiary standards you need to demonstrate.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Dietterle maintains a lifetime approval rate of 53% across 8,073 lifetime decisions. In the latest reporting period, this judge's rate sits 5 points below the Seattle Hearing Office average and 5 points below the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical snapshot of past activity rather than a guarantee of future results.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dietterle's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a 4-year tenure, Judge Dietterle has demonstrated a consistent decision-making pattern. Yearly approval rates have remained steady, moving from 55% in 2016 to 54% in the most recent reporting period. This stability suggests a predictable approach to evaluating evidence and medical documentation.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dietterle's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Dietterle? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Seattle hearing office
The Seattle Hearing Office serves you throughout Washington, managing a high volume of cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 58%, reflecting the broader regional trends in disability adjudication. You should be prepared for a rigorous review of your medical records and vocational history. You can see the Seattle Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Seattle Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 27% to 66%. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent across all courtrooms.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
