SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Amber Downs

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,076 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing Amber Downs to the broader Tampa OHO bench highlights the variance in decision-making across the office. While the lifetime approval rate is 31%, the office-wide lifetime range spans from 31% to 90%. In the most recent reporting period, the 40% approval rate sits 19 points below the office average of 59%. These figures are based on a volume of 3,076 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 31%
Decisions on record 3,076
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Downs Tampa OHO National
Approval rate 40% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 37%
Denials 60%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Downs's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Downs
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval record for Amber Downs has remained relatively steady, with yearly rates hovering near the 30% mark for much of the period since 2016. While the rate dipped to 24% in 2020, it has since stabilized, showing a recent uptick to 40% in the latest reporting period. This pattern suggests a consistent approach to case evaluation. The data provides a clear view of how cases have been handled over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Downs's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa OHO hearing office

The Tampa OHO serves you across Florida, operating as a central hub for disability hearings in the region. The office maintains a diverse bench of 16 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 59%. You can expect a review process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in any decision. You can see the Tampa OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 90% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions