SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Glen H. Watkins

Last decided Tampa OHOJul 2026
Decisions 4,120since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's overall approval rate since 2016 is 34%, recent trends show a 41% approval rate in the latest reporting period. These figures are measured against the broader bench at the Tampa OHO, where individual judge approval rates since 2016 range from 31% to 90%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 34%
Decisions on record 4,120
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Watkins Tampa OHO National
Approval rate 41% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 36% — —
Denials 59% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Watkins's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Watkins
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Glen H. Watkins has shown shifts across the 4,120 decisions on record since 2016. After a period of lower approval rates between 2017 and 2018, the trend saw an increase starting in 2023. The latest reporting period shows a 41% approval rate, which remains higher than the long-term average. This recent activity reflects a shift in the pattern of decisions compared to the period starting in 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Watkins's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa OHO hearing office

Glen H. Watkins's most recent office on record is the Tampa OHO, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the Florida region and maintains a bench of 16 judges. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 59%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical evidence and vocational history. You can see the Tampa OHO Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tampa OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tampa OHO, 11 of whom decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 90% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions