SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert Droker

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,287 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Robert Droker reflect a decade of decision-making within the Social Security Administration. When comparing his 43% lifetime rate against the Jacksonville office-wide range of 33% to 78%, you can see where he sits relative to his peers. These figures are derived from 3,287 lifetime decisions, providing a statistically significant view of his docket. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 43%
Decisions on record 3,287
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Droker Jacksonville National
Approval rate 49% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 51%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Droker's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Droker
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Robert Droker has shown varied movement. While his lifetime average sits at 43%, the latest reporting period shows a 49% approval rate. This recent performance indicates a slight deviation from his long-term historical trend. These fluctuations often mirror changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence presented during your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Droker's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Jacksonville hearing office

The Jacksonville hearing office serves a broad population across Florida, managing a high volume of disability claims. With 17 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 51%. You should be prepared for a formal administrative process focused on medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can see the Jacksonville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Robert Droker is essentially random. There are 17 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, spanning from 33% to 78% lifetime. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions