Robert Droker is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Jacksonville office. Over 10 years on the bench and 19,644 lifetime decisions, your judge has an approval rate of 42%. Because Social Security Administration case assignment is random, the judge you draw matters significantly. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Droker maintains a lifetime approval rate of 42% based on 19,644 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded an approval rate of 52%, compared to the Jacksonville Hearing Office average of 54% and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical snapshot of the judge's history on the bench rather than a prediction for your hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Droker's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a 10-year tenure, your judge's approval rates have fluctuated, ranging from 37% in 2021 to 52% in 2025. The data shows a period of volatility followed by a recent shift toward higher approval rates in the most recent reporting cycle. This trend indicates that the judge's approach to evidence and case evaluation evolves alongside changes in the broader Social Security disability landscape.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Droker's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Droker? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Jacksonville hearing office
The Jacksonville Hearing Office serves a large population across Northern Florida, managing a high volume of SSDI claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 54%, reflecting the complex nature of the cases processed in this region. You can visit the Jacksonville Hearing Office page for more information on the local roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Jacksonville Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 38% to 70%. While these differences exist, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent across all courtrooms.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
