SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tanya Dvarishkis

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Billings Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 21,801 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

In the most recent reporting period, Judge Dvarishkis maintained an approval rate of 77%, which is 11 percentage points higher than the national average of 58%. This performance is also 5 points above the current Billings Hearing Office average of 64%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 21,801 lifetime decisions accumulated over her 10-year tenure. You can find more information on the Billings Hearing Office page.

Metric Judge Dvarishkis Billings National
Approval rate 69% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 56%
Denials 23%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dvarishkis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dvarishkis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 10 years on the bench, Judge Dvarishkis has shown a consistent approach to disability adjudication. While her approval rates fluctuated between 63% and 73% during the middle of her career, the most recent data shows an upward trend, reaching 77% in the latest period. This pattern reflects her established judicial approach, though your individual case outcome always depends on the specific medical evidence you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dvarishkis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Dvarishkis? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Billings hearing office

The Billings Hearing Office serves you across Montana, managing a high volume of cases within the region. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 64%. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence supporting your claim. You can see the Billings Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the Billings Hearing Office, the bench consists of 6 judges whose lifetime approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 69%. This variance highlights why understanding the tendencies of your assigned judge is a standard part of your hearing preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions