Kimani R. Eason has an approval rate of 46% across 4,131 decisions on record since 2016. The judge's most recent office on record is the Houston West hearing office, with activity through July 2026. Because case assignment is random, understanding this data is a key step in your preparation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same time periods to ensure accuracy. While the judge's overall approval rate since 2016 is 46%, the latest reporting period shows a 57% approval rate. This latest figure compares to a 53% rate for the Houston West hearing office, a 56% rate for Texas, and a 58% national average. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable view of past trends.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Eason's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, the approval rate for Kimani R. Eason has shown notable fluctuation. After starting at 38% in 2016, the rate moved through various cycles, reaching 57% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 4,131 total decisions on record, the data reflects a dynamic approach to case evaluation. The latest period shows an uptick compared to the historical average, which may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Eason's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Houston West hearing office
The Houston West hearing office is the judge's most recent office on record, with activity recorded through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 14 judges. The office-wide approval rate during the latest reporting period was 53%.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Houston West
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Houston West hearing office, and 10 of them decided cases there in SSA's latest file. Approval rates for these judges range from 8% to 73% on their records since 2016.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Kimani R. Eason's 46% approval rate since 2016 sits within the broader range of 8% to 73% observed among the 14 judges at the Houston West hearing office. Because each judge evaluates evidence differently, having an attorney who understands these local patterns can be a significant advantage for your case.
Yes, the approval rate for Kimani R. Eason has varied over time, ranging from a low of 37% in 2019 to 57% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. These shifts are common in disability adjudication as case types and evidence standards evolve. An attorney can help you build a case that addresses the specific requirements of this judge.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration uses a random, automated workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases to ALJs. Since you cannot control the assignment, focusing on the quality of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare for your hearing. An attorney can help you prepare.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where the judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be asked questions about your work history and daily limitations. Working with an attorney ensures you are prepared to present your testimony clearly and effectively before the judge.
The 46% approval rate for Kimani R. Eason is a statistical observation of past decisions, not a prediction of your outcome. Every case is unique, and your eligibility depends primarily on the medical evidence you provide. An attorney can review your file to see if your case is well-positioned for a favorable decision.




