SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kimani R. Eason

Last decided Houston WestJul 2026
Decisions 4,131since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same time periods to ensure accuracy. While the judge's overall approval rate since 2016 is 46%, the latest reporting period shows a 57% approval rate. This latest figure compares to a 53% rate for the Houston West hearing office, a 56% rate for Texas, and a 58% national average. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable view of past trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 46%
Decisions on record 4,131
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Eason Houston West National
Approval rate 57% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 40% — —
Denials 43% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Eason's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Eason
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Kimani R. Eason has shown notable fluctuation. After starting at 38% in 2016, the rate moved through various cycles, reaching 57% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 4,131 total decisions on record, the data reflects a dynamic approach to case evaluation. The latest period shows an uptick compared to the historical average, which may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Eason's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Houston West hearing office

The Houston West hearing office is the judge's most recent office on record, with activity recorded through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 14 judges. The office-wide approval rate during the latest reporting period was 53%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Houston West

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Houston West hearing office, and 10 of them decided cases there in SSA's latest file. Approval rates for these judges range from 8% to 73% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions