SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeffrey L. Eastham

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 2,399 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure the data remains meaningful. Jeffrey L. Eastham maintains a lifetime approval rate of 42% across 2,399 decisions, which sits within the broader Lexington office range of 21% to 79%. In the most recent reporting period, his 53% approval rate tracks 3 percentage points above the office average of 50%.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 2,399
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Eastham Lexington National
Approval rate 53% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 41%
Denials 47%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Eastham's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Eastham
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision pattern for Jeffrey L. Eastham shows variance over the years, beginning with a 66% approval rate in 2018 before shifting in subsequent years. Following a period of fluctuation, the latest data indicates a 53% approval rate. These trends reflect the evolving nature of the evidence presented in each case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Eastham's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lexington hearing office

The Lexington hearing office serves you throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. With 18 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 50%. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in the outcome.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 21% to 79% on a lifetime basis.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions