SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeremy G. Eldred

Last decided SyracuseJul 2026
Decisions 3,535since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Jeremy G. Eldred is based on 3,535 decisions on record since 2016. When comparing this to the broader bench at the Syracuse hearing office, where approval rates range from 40% to 86%, you can see how his record fits within the local context. In the most recent reporting period, his 70% approval rate sits 13 points above the office average of 57%. These figures reflect past performance rather than a guarantee of your future outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 3,535
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Eldred Syracuse National
Approval rate 70% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 63% — —
Denials 30% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Eldred's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Eldred
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2016, Jeremy G. Eldred has maintained a consistent pattern across 3,535 decisions on record. While the approval rate saw a dip in 2022, the trend has shown an upward shift in recent years, with the latest period reaching 70%. This recent performance reflects a continuation of a positive trend compared to his historical average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Eldred's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Syracuse hearing office

The Syracuse hearing office serves claimants across New York. This office has a bench of 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 57%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Syracuse

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Syracuse hearing office, and 7 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 40% to 86% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions