Jonathan Eliot is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Cleveland Hearing Office with a lifetime approval rate of 29% over 1,728 lifetime decisions. This rate sits below the national average of 58%, though these figures describe past decisions rather than predictions for your specific hearing. Because case assignment is random, understanding your judge's history is a vital step in preparing your claim. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's lifetime approval rate against current office and national benchmarks provides a clearer picture of the local hearing environment. Judge Eliot has maintained a 29% approval rate across 1,728 lifetime decisions. These figures sit below the current national average of 58% and the Cleveland office average of 53%. These rates reflect the specific caseload and evidentiary standards observed during his tenure.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Eliot's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 1 year on the bench, Judge Eliot has presided over 1,728 lifetime decisions. His approval rate has remained at 29% throughout his reporting period. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating the medical and vocational evidence you present in your disability claim.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Eliot's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Eliot? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Cleveland hearing office
The Cleveland Hearing Office serves you and other claimants throughout Ohio, managing a high volume of disability cases. With a bench of 6 judges, the office currently reports an approval rate of 53%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the documentation of your impairments and work history. You can visit the Cleveland Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Cleveland office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 29% to 65%. This variance highlights why understanding the local bench is helpful for your preparation. You can find more information on the Cleveland Hearing Office page.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
