SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul Elkin

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,485 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing judicial performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. Paul Elkin's lifetime approval rate of 51% sits within the 50% to 76% range observed across the Columbia SC bench. In the most recent reporting period, his 45% approval rate differs from the office-wide rate of 62%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,485
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Elkin Columbia SC National
Approval rate 45% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 44%
Denials 55%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Elkin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Elkin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Paul Elkin has presided over 3,485 decisions. His yearly approval rate has fluctuated over the last decade. While the latest-period approval rate of 45% is lower than his lifetime average, this trend reflects a variation in case outcomes rather than a permanent shift in judicial philosophy. The pattern suggests that the evidence presented in your file remains the primary driver of the final decision.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Elkin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbia SC hearing office

The Columbia SC hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 11 judges on record. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 62%, this location handles a high volume of disability claims. You can expect a formal process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the Columbia SC hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Columbia SC hearing office currently has 11 judges on record, with 6 reporting in the latest SSA data. Because the SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot choose your judge. The lifetime approval rates for the judges at this office vary from 50% to 76%. Guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions