SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Deborah E. Ellis

Last decided OrlandoJul 2026
Decisions 3,137since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing judicial approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While the since-2016 record provides a long-term view of decision patterns, the latest-period figures offer a snapshot of current trends relative to the Orlando Hearing Office, state, and national averages. With 3,137 decisions on record, the data provides a look at how this bench operates. These aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 34%
Decisions on record 3,137
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Ellis Orlando National
Approval rate 100% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 100% — —
Denials 0% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ellis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ellis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, the approval rate for Deborah E. Ellis has shown variation across 3,137 decisions on record. The yearly trend indicates a period of relative stability followed by a decline in recent years, with the latest reporting period showing a 100% approval rate based on a single decision. This recent figure is a partial data point and should be viewed in the context of the longer-term trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ellis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orlando hearing office

Deborah E. Ellis's most recent office on record is the Orlando Hearing Office. This office maintains a bench of 17 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 60%, you can expect a review of your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orlando

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orlando Hearing Office, and 8 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 34% to 89% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions