Andrew M. Emerson is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Washington Hearing Office with a lifetime approval rate of 51% across 17,263 decisions. This sits below the national average of 58%. Because case assignment is random, understanding these patterns is vital. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench and ensure your evidence is presented effectively.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's lifetime performance to current office and national benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Emerson has issued 17,263 decisions during a 10-year tenure. While the national approval rate currently sits at 58%, Judge Emerson's latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 50%. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Emerson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over the past decade, your judge's approval rate has experienced fluctuations, moving from 51% in 2016 to a low of 43% in 2021 before stabilizing at 51% in 2025. This 10-year window of 17,263 decisions demonstrates a consistent approach to case evaluation. The recent trend indicates a return to the judge's long-term average after a period of lower approval rates.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Emerson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Emerson? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Washington hearing office
The Washington (District of Columbia) hearing office serves a broad population in the region, managing a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 61%, the facility handles cases with a focus on administrative efficiency. You should be prepared for a formal process that prioritizes medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can find more information on the Washington (District of Columbia) Hearing Office page.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. The Washington hearing office features a bench with lifetime approval rates ranging from 33% to 57%. Because each judge manages their docket differently, understanding the office-wide environment is as important as looking at one individual's history.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
