SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Andrew M. Emerson

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Washington Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 17,263 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Emerson?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's lifetime performance to current office and national benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Emerson has issued 17,263 decisions during a 10-year tenure. While the national approval rate currently sits at 58%, Judge Emerson's latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 50%. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Emerson Washington National
Approval rate 51% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 50%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Emerson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Emerson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over the past decade, your judge's approval rate has experienced fluctuations, moving from 51% in 2016 to a low of 43% in 2021 before stabilizing at 51% in 2025. This 10-year window of 17,263 decisions demonstrates a consistent approach to case evaluation. The recent trend indicates a return to the judge's long-term average after a period of lower approval rates.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Emerson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Emerson? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington (District of Columbia) hearing office serves a broad population in the region, managing a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 61%, the facility handles cases with a focus on administrative efficiency. You should be prepared for a formal process that prioritizes medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can find more information on the Washington (District of Columbia) Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. The Washington hearing office features a bench with lifetime approval rates ranging from 33% to 57%. Because each judge manages their docket differently, understanding the office-wide environment is as important as looking at one individual's history.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions