SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary L. Everstine

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Santa Barbara Hearing Office · 9 years on the bench · 12,470 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Everstine?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to regional and national benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Everstine's lifetime rate of 49% across 12,470 decisions is measured against the current Santa Barbara Hearing Office average of 74% and the national average of 58%. These figures offer a statistical snapshot of the bench, though they do not serve as a prediction for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Everstine Santa Barbara National
Approval rate 49% 74% 58%
Fully favorable 42%
Denials 51%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Everstine's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Everstine
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 9 years on the bench, Judge Everstine has navigated a varied caseload, with yearly approval rates ranging from a low of 38% in 2022 to a high of 61% in 2020. Her 12,470 lifetime decisions demonstrate a career that has adapted to changing evidentiary requirements and case volumes. Recent data from 2024 shows a rate of 49%, which aligns closely with her long-term career average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Everstine's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Everstine? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Santa Barbara hearing office

The Santa Barbara Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across the region, managing a high volume of disability cases with a bench of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently reports an approval rate of 74%, providing a local venue for you to present your claim. You can expect a formal environment where your medical documentation and vocational testimony are prioritized.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. At the Santa Barbara Hearing Office, the bench consists of 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 36% to 81%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare for your day in court.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions