SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Aubri G. Masterson

Last decided Santa BarbaraJul 2026
Decisions 3,572since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Aubri G. Masterson's 91% approval rate sits above the 69% office average, 60% state average, and 58% national average. The record since 2016 includes 3,572 decisions. These figures reflect past activity rather than a prediction for your specific hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Masterson Santa Barbara National
Approval rate 91% 69% 58%
Fully favorable 86% — —
Denials 9% — —
Decisions 260 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 82%
Decisions on record 3,572

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Masterson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Masterson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Aubri G. Masterson has issued 3,572 decisions. The yearly trend shows an approval rate that has remained high, with the most recent 12 months sitting above the 82% approval rate recorded since 2016. The data reflects a consistent volume of activity.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Masterson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Santa Barbara hearing office

The Santa Barbara office is the most recent office on record for Aubri G. Masterson, as of July 2026. The office's bench consists of 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the office maintained a 69% approval rate.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Santa Barbara

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 3 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 48% to 91% over the 12-month window. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 3 of them deciding cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Masterson's 91%. One of them last decided cases in California. With too few close matches there, the rest come from other regions.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Masterson and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions