SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ann Farris

Last decided AlbuquerqueSep 2020
Decisions 1,561since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 52% approval rate for Ann Farris reflects her decisions on record since 2016. This is compared against the 41% to 89% range observed among the 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Albuquerque. These figures provide a statistical baseline for your hearing, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your specific case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 1,561

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Farris. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Farris's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Farris
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Ann Farris has shown variation across the 1,561 decisions on record since 2016. After an initial approval rate of 53% in 2016, the annual figures were 59% in 2017, 53% in 2018, 47% in 2019, and 49% in 2020. This pattern indicates that the judge's decision-making has shifted over the recorded period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Farris's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albuquerque hearing office

Ann Farris's most recent office on record is the Albuquerque hearing office, which serves claimants across New Mexico. This office maintains a bench of 14 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. If you are appearing at this office, you should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Albuquerque

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Albuquerque office, with approval rates ranging from 41% to 89% on their since-2016 records. Because case assignment is outside of your control, you should focus on preparing the strongest possible evidence for your specific claim.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions