SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Cheri L. Filion

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Seattle Hearing Office · 1 years on the bench · 1,188 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Filion?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks helps provide context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Filion's lifetime rate of 52% is measured against the Seattle Hearing Office latest average of 58% and the national average of 58%. These comparisons are based on a docket of 1,188 lifetime decisions, offering a view of her decision-making history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Filion Seattle National
Approval rate 52% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 44%
Denials 48%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Filion's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Filion
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

During her tenure, Judge Filion has maintained a consistent approach to disability adjudication. With 1 year on the bench and 1,188 lifetime decisions, her approval rate has remained steady at 52%. This stability suggests a predictable pattern in how she evaluates evidence and testimony. The latest reporting period shows her rate remains aligned with her long-term career average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Filion's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Filion? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seattle hearing office

The Seattle Hearing Office serves a large population across Washington, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently reports an approval rate of 58%, which serves as a local benchmark for your claim. You can expect a professional environment where the focus remains on the medical and vocational evidence you present. You can see the Seattle Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Seattle Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 27% to 66%. Because of this variance, it is important to focus on the strength of your own medical documentation and testimony. You can find more information on the office's general operations on the Seattle Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions