SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John M. Fitzpatrick

Last decided PhiladelphiaSep 2016
Decisions 180since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When reviewing approval rates, compare figures from the same time periods to ensure accuracy. The 73% approval rate for John M. Fitzpatrick reflects your total decisions on record since January 2016. This figure sits within the 42% to 78% range observed among the 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Philadelphia hearing office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 73%
Decisions on record 180

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Fitzpatrick. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Fitzpatrick's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Fitzpatrick
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The data for John M. Fitzpatrick covers 180 decisions on record starting in January 2016. During this period, the approval rate remained consistent at 73%. Because this record is limited to a specific window in 2016, it provides a snapshot of the judge's activity during that time. This steady pattern helps establish the baseline for the judge's historical decision-making.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Fitzpatrick's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Philadelphia hearing office

The Philadelphia hearing office serves you across Pennsylvania and the surrounding region. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. While the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 56%, your individual outcome depends on the specific evidence presented in your case.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Philadelphia

Social Security Administration cases are assigned through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Philadelphia hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 42% to 78% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions