SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Nicolas R. Foster

Last decided RichmondJul 2026
Decisions 4,189since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While your judge's approval rate on record since 2016 is 49%, the latest-period data provides a more focused view of recent activity. The Richmond office bench shows a wide range of approval rates, from 18% to 59% since 2016, highlighting the importance of case preparation.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 4,189
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Foster Richmond National
Approval rate 46% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 38% — —
Denials 54% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Foster's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Foster
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Nicolas R. Foster has fluctuated since 2016. With 4,189 total decisions on record, the judge has maintained a consistent presence in the Richmond office. While the 2026 fiscal year-to-date rate of 47% is slightly below the long-term average, it remains within the historical range observed since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Foster's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Richmond hearing office

Nicolas R. Foster's most recent office on record is the Richmond hearing office, as of July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges who have recorded decisions there since 2016. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 45%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Richmond

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Richmond hearing office. Approval rates among this group vary significantly, ranging from 18% to 59% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions