SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Anthony J. Johnson Jr.

Last decided RichmondSep 2025
Decisions 3,203since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 50% approval rate for Anthony J. Johnson Jr. reflects performance across 3,203 decisions since 2016, which compares against the 18% to 59% range of peers at the Richmond office. This data provides a view of historical trends rather than a guarantee of future outcomes. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 3,203

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Johnson Jr.. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Johnson Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Johnson Jr.
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Anthony J. Johnson Jr. has fluctuated across the 3,203 decisions on record since 2016. After a period of stability in the late 2010s, the data shows a decline in 2020 and 2021 before a recovery in 2023 and 2024. The most recent data from 2025 shows a 54% approval rate. These patterns often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented, rather than a change in judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Johnson Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Richmond hearing office

Anthony J. Johnson Jr.'s most recent office on record is the Richmond hearing office, which serves you across Virginia. This office is part of a regional network that handles a high volume of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of medical evidence is the primary factor in a decision. You can see the Richmond Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Richmond

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Richmond hearing office. Approval rates among this bench vary significantly, ranging from 18% to 59% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions