SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paula Fow

Last decided PhoenixDec 2016
Decisions 289since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 44% approval rate for Paula Fow reflects all decisions on record since 2016. This can be measured against the 32% to 78% range seen among the 12 judges whose most recent office on record is Phoenix. These figures provide a statistical baseline derived from hundreds of cases. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 289

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Fow. The most recent period with decisions on record is December 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Fow's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Fow
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The data for Paula Fow covers 289 decisions on record since 2016. The yearly trend shows an approval rate of 46% in 2016 and 35% in 2017. This pattern highlights the importance of presenting a complete medical record, as the judge's decision-making process is influenced by the specific evidence and case mix presented in each hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Fow's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Phoenix hearing office

The Phoenix hearing office serves claimants throughout Arizona and the surrounding region. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Claimants at this office can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of medical evidence is the primary factor in the judge's decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Phoenix

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Phoenix hearing office, there are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. These judges show a wide variance in approval rates, ranging from 32% to 78% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions