SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Eric S. Fulcher

Last decided MaconJul 2026
Decisions 4,051since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's overall approval rate on record since 2016 is 48%, recent data shows a 48% approval rate during the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 2 percentage points above the Macon office average of 46%, though it remains 10 points below the national average of 58%. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable statistical baseline for your review.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 4,051
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Fulcher Macon National
Approval rate 48% 46% 58%
Fully favorable 36% — —
Denials 52% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Fulcher's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Fulcher
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Eric S. Fulcher has fluctuated since 2016. After reaching a low of 38% in 2021, the approval rate saw a rise through 2025, before settling at 48% in the most recent partial fiscal year. This pattern indicates that decision-making is not static and can shift over time. The latest period reflects a return toward the long-term average after a period of higher approval rates in the preceding years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Fulcher's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Macon hearing office

Eric S. Fulcher's most recent office on record is the Macon hearing office, which serves claimants across Georgia. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges, and the office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 46%. You can expect a formal hearing process where your evidence quality is the primary factor in your outcome. You can visit the Macon Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Macon

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assigned judge is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Macon office, 7 of whom decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 31% to 72% on their since-2016 records. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions