SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David Cornelius

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Macon Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 21,937 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Cornelius maintains a lifetime approval rate of 65% based on 21,937 lifetime decisions, which sits higher than the current 48% approval rate seen across the Macon Hearing Office. While national and state averages hover around 58%, these figures serve as a baseline rather than a guarantee.

Metric Judge Cornelius Macon National
Approval rate 65% 48% 58%
Fully favorable 43%
Denials 40%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cornelius's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cornelius
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade on the bench, your approval patterns for Judge Cornelius have shown periodic shifts. His yearly trend reflects a range of outcomes, with approval rates moving between 54% and 75% over the course of his tenure. The most recent reporting period shows an approval rate of 60%, which remains elevated compared to the broader office environment. This trend suggests a stable approach to case evaluation that has persisted throughout his career.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cornelius's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Cornelius? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Macon hearing office

The Macon Hearing Office serves a significant portion of Georgia, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently reports an approval rate of 48%, reflecting the diverse nature of the cases heard in this region. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the Macon Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 30% to 65%. Because of this variance, understanding the local bench is a standard part of your case preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions