Emily Y. Howard's most recent office on record is the Macon hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 4,051 decisions on record since 2016, 31% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 31% to 72% on their since-2016 records. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your specific case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Evaluating a judge's history requires comparing their performance against the broader bench at their office. While Emily Y. Howard has an approval rate of 31% since 2016, the 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Macon office show a range of 31% to 72% for the same period. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 18% approval rate is below the office average of 46%. These figures are based on thousands of decisions, providing a view of past trends.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Howard's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, Emily Y. Howard has issued 4,051 decisions. The yearly trend shows variance, with approval rates reaching 46% in 2020 before trending downward. The latest reporting period shows an 18% approval rate, reflecting a continuation of the lower approval trend observed in recent years. This pattern suggests that recent decisions have been more restrictive than the historical average, though changes in case mix or evidence quality may influence these outcomes.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Howard's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Macon hearing office
The Macon hearing office serves you and other claimants in the region. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. In the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate was 46%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Macon
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Macon office, and 7 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 31% to 72% for cases decided since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Emily Y. Howard has an approval rate of 31% on her record since 2016. This is at the lower end of the 31% to 72% range observed among the 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Macon office. An attorney can help you prepare a case that addresses the specific evidentiary standards often applied in this office.
Yes, the approval rate for Emily Y. Howard has fluctuated over time. After reaching 46% in 2020, the rate has trended downward, with an 18% approval rate in the most recent reporting period. Understanding these trends is part of how an attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because assignment is random, it is vital to have an attorney who can help you prepare for any judge.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and testimony. You will likely be asked about your daily limitations and work history. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and organize your medical evidence to ensure your case is presented clearly.
A judge's historical approval rate is a reflection of past decisions, not a guarantee of how they will rule on your specific claim. Your success depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence and your ability to demonstrate how your condition prevents you from working. An attorney can help you gather the necessary documentation to build a strong case.




