SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert E. Gale

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Syracuse Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 1,439 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Gale?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Gale maintains a lifetime approval rate of 49%, calculated from 1,439 lifetime decisions. When comparing recent performance, the judge's approval rate is 7 percentage points lower than the Syracuse Hearing Office average and 9 percentage points below the national average. These figures provide a statistical baseline for the judge's tenure, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Gale Syracuse National
Approval rate 49% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 42%
Denials 51%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gale's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gale
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 2-year tenure, your judge's approval patterns have shown a shift from 51% in 2016 to 44% in 2017. This trend reflects activity across 1,439 lifetime decisions. While yearly fluctuations are common in the Social Security Administration hearing process, the data indicates a downward trend in approval frequency compared to the judge's initial period on the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gale's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Gale? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Syracuse hearing office

The Syracuse Hearing Office serves a significant population across New York, managing a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide approval rate of 56%, it functions as a critical hub for regional SSDI adjudication. You should be prepared for rigorous evidence review and standard procedural requirements when you appear here. You can see the Syracuse Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Syracuse Hearing Office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your specific judge is selected randomly. The bench at this office features a range of approval rates, spanning from 43% to 60% across the 6 ALJs. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving your disability remain consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions