SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary Gallagher Dilley

Last decided SeattleSep 2020
Decisions 1,511since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 67% approval rate for Mary Gallagher Dilley reflects her total decisions on record since 2016. This can be measured against the 21% to 93% range of the 22 other judges whose most recent office on record is also Seattle. These figures provide a statistical baseline for the office's bench.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 1,511

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Dilley. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dilley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dilley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Mary Gallagher Dilley has shown a steady trend across her 1,511 decisions on record since 2016. Starting at 62% in 2016, the rate reached 70% by 2020. This pattern indicates a consistent approach to evaluating evidence over the recorded period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dilley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seattle hearing office

The Seattle hearing office is the most recent office on record for 22 judges as of September 2020. This bench reflects a diverse range of approval patterns. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Seattle hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 21% to 93% on their since-2016 records. Because of this variance, understanding the bench is helpful for your preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions