SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David K. Gatto

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Las Vegas Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 23,556 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Gatto?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Gatto's 57% lifetime approval rate is measured against the latest office-wide approval rate of 60% and the national average of 58%. With 23,556 decisions on record, this data offers a stable view of his historical decision-making. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Gatto Las Vegas National
Approval rate 57% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 66%
Denials 31%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gatto's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gatto
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10-year tenure, Judge Gatto has shown an upward trend in his approval rates. Starting at 42% in 2016, his annual approval frequency has climbed, reaching 70% in 2025. This shift indicates a move toward higher allowance rates in recent years compared to his early career. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, which may be influenced by changes in case evidence or legal standards.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gatto's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Gatto? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Las Vegas hearing office

The Las Vegas Hearing Office serves claimants across Nevada, managing a high volume of disability cases. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 60% in the latest reporting period. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical documentation and work history. You can see the Las Vegas Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Las Vegas Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 35% to 68%. Because you cannot choose your judge, your focus should remain on the strength of your medical evidence. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions