Robert Gill is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Ft Lauderdale hearing office. With a lifetime approval rate of 76% over 9,371 lifetime decisions, he sits above the national average of 58%. While his recent approval rate is 28 points higher than the office average, remember that aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Gill’s approval rate is notably higher than the broader benchmarks for the region. In the most recent reporting period, his rate outperformed the Ft Lauderdale Hearing Office average by 28 percentage points and the national average by 18 percentage points. These statistics are derived from a substantial docket of 9,371 lifetime decisions accumulated over seven years. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gill's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his seven-year tenure, Judge Gill has maintained a generally high approval rate, with yearly performance fluctuating between 67% and 82%. While the rate dipped in 2019, the subsequent years showed a return to higher approval levels, including an 82% mark in 2021. This pattern suggests a consistent approach to evaluating your disability claim.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gill's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Gill? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Ft Lauderdale hearing office
The Ft Lauderdale Hearing Office serves a large population in Florida, managing a high volume of disability claims through a team of six administrative law judges. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 48%, which serves as a baseline for the region. You can visit the Ft Lauderdale Hearing Office page for more information on the local roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the assignment process is effectively random. Within the Ft Lauderdale Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the six judges range from 36% to 76%. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
