SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sara A. Gillis

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,273 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While Gillis holds a 58% lifetime approval rate, the latest reporting period shows a 56% approval rate, which is 12 percentage points below the current 68% office-wide average. These figures are based on 4,273 lifetime decisions. These rates reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your upcoming hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 4,273
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Gillis Sacramento National
Approval rate 56% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 40%
Denials 44%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gillis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gillis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval record for Gillis has fluctuated since 2016. While the rate reached 69% in 2024, the most recent data shows a rate of 57% in 2026. This pattern reflects the judge's response to the specific evidence presented in each case. The latest period shows a continuation of this steady pattern within the broader context of the Sacramento office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gillis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

The Sacramento hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a hub for SSDI hearings in California. With 20 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 68%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence supporting your claim. You can visit the Sacramento hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. There are 20 judges on record at this office since 2016, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 39% to 80%. Because every judge interprets evidence differently, understanding the office-wide landscape is helpful for your preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions