SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lori S. Grayson

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,137 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Lori S. Grayson's 42% lifetime approval rate sits within the 25% to 76% range observed across the Hattiesburg bench. In the latest reporting period, her 42% approval rate compares against the office-wide rate of 50%. These figures rely on a substantial docket of 3,137 lifetime decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 3,137
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Grayson Hattiesburg National
Approval rate 42% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 35%
Denials 58%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Grayson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Grayson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Lori S. Grayson's approval rate has shown a varied trajectory. After an initial period of relative stability, the rate saw a decline in 2019 before beginning a gradual recovery in subsequent years. The most recent data indicates the rate has held at 42%. This pattern reflects her established decision-making habits over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Grayson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Hattiesburg hearing office

The Hattiesburg hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 11 judges on record. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 50%, this location handles a high volume of cases requiring careful documentation. You should expect a formal proceeding where the quality of medical evidence is the primary factor in the outcome.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Hattiesburg hearing office currently features 11 judges on record since 2016, with 7 judges reporting in the latest SSA data. Because the SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot choose your judge; assignment is effectively random. Approval rates at this office vary significantly, ranging from 25% to 76% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions