SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lori S. Grayson

Last decided HattiesburgJul 2026
Decisions 3,137since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Lori S. Grayson are calculated based on 3,137 decisions on record since 2016. When comparing these figures, look at the bench's since-2016 range of 25% to 76% to understand the broader context of the Hattiesburg hearing office. Latest-period data shows the judge's approval rate is 8 points lower than the office average of 50%. These aggregate rates reflect past decisions rather than individual case outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 3,137
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Grayson Hattiesburg National
Approval rate 42% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 35% — —
Denials 58% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Grayson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Grayson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge's approval rate has fluctuated, moving from 46% in 2017 to a low of 35% in 2019 before reaching 48% in 2024. The latest period shows a rate of 42%, which aligns with the overall average on record. This pattern suggests that while annual approval rates vary, the judge maintains a consistent approach to the evidence presented in disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Grayson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Hattiesburg hearing office

The Hattiesburg hearing office serves claimants across Mississippi and is one of the primary locations for regional disability hearings. The office bench consists of 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 50%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Hattiesburg

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is the Hattiesburg hearing office, and 7 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 25% to 76% on their since-2016 records. Preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions