SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Adrienne Porter

Last decided Fayetteville NCJul 2026
Decisions 3,970since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Adrienne Porter's 68% approval rate since 2016 sits within a range of 35% to 78% for the bench of 7 judges whose most recent office on record is Fayetteville NC. In the most recent reporting period, Adrienne Porter maintained a 75% approval rate, which is 10 percentage points higher than the office and state averages of 65%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 3,970
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Porter Fayetteville NC National
Approval rate 75% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 67% — —
Denials 25% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Porter's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Porter
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2016, Adrienne Porter has issued 3,970 decisions. The yearly approval trend has fluctuated, showing a high of 85% in 2017 and a low of 56% in 2024, before rising to 75% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent uptick suggests a shift in the latest period compared to the 2024 and 2025 figures. These variations often reflect changes in the underlying case mix or the quality of evidence presented in your hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Porter's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fayetteville NC hearing office

Adrienne Porter's most recent office on record is the Fayetteville NC hearing office, which serves the surrounding region of North Carolina. This office maintains a bench of 7 judges, and the office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 65%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Fayetteville NC Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Fayetteville NC

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is Fayetteville NC, and 4 of them decided cases in the latest SSA file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 35% to 78% based on records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions