Mark B. Greenberg's most recent SSA record (September 2019) is at the San Diego hearing office. Across the 1,590 decisions on record since 2016, 63% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 37% to 68% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 63% approval rate for Mark B. Greenberg reflects his total decisions on record since 2016, which you can compare against the 37% to 68% range observed among the 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Diego hearing office. This range provides a view of how different judges at this location have historically approached their dockets.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Greenberg. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Greenberg's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Mark B. Greenberg has remained consistent throughout his time on record since 2016. Across 1,590 total decisions, the annual approval rate held steady, moving from 61% in 2016 to 63% by 2019. This stability suggests a predictable approach to case evaluation over the period observed. Because case assignment is random, this pattern serves as a baseline for understanding how your claim might be processed.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Greenberg's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the San Diego hearing office
Mark B. Greenberg's most recent office on record is the San Diego hearing office. This office hosts a bench of 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Diego
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Diego hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 37% to 68% on their since-2016 records. While these figures vary, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent across the entire bench.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Mark B. Greenberg has an approval rate of 63% based on 1,590 decisions on record since 2016. This places him within the 37% to 68% range of approval rates for the 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Diego hearing office. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the specific evidentiary standards of this bench.
His approval rate has remained steady, starting at 61% in 2016 and reaching 63% by 2019. This consistent pattern across 1,590 decisions suggests a stable approach to case adjudication. An attorney can help you understand how your specific evidence fits into this pattern.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency, making the assignment process random. Regardless of the judge assigned, an attorney can help you build a strong case.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical evidence and hears your testimony. You will likely be asked about your work history, daily limitations, and the nature of your impairments. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and organize your medical records for the hearing.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and is not a prediction of your specific outcome. While Mark B. Greenberg has a 63% approval rate on record since 2016, your success depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence. An attorney can help you determine if your case is well-positioned for a favorable decision.




