SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. K. Dickson Grissom

Last decided KnoxvilleJul 2026
Decisions 3,149since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While your judge's 66% approval rate covers the entire period since 2016, latest-period figures provide a snapshot of more recent activity. In the latest reporting period, the judge's approval rate was 33%, which is 15 percentage points lower than the Knoxville office's latest-period rate of 48%. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable foundation for analysis.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 3,149
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Grissom Knoxville National
Approval rate 33% 48% 58%
Fully favorable 33% — —
Denials 67% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Grissom's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Grissom
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for K. Dickson Grissom has experienced fluctuations since the record began in 2016. After reaching a high of 80% in 2017, the annual approval rate trended downward, settling at 59% in 2024 and 2025. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 33% approval rate over a partial year of 8 decisions. This recent shift represents a departure from the long-term average, though partial-year data may not reflect a full-year trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Grissom's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Knoxville hearing office

The Knoxville hearing office serves you and other claimants across Tennessee and the surrounding region. It hosts a bench of 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 48%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence you present.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Knoxville

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Knoxville hearing office, there are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 5 of them having decided cases in the latest file from July 2026. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 13% to 77% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions