SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Seth I. Grossman

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the New York Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 16,481 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Grossman?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Grossman has issued 16,481 lifetime decisions during his 10 years on the bench. In the most recent reporting period, your approval rate was 46%, which compares to the New York Hearing Office average of 60% and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding his courtroom history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Grossman New York National
Approval rate 40% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 39%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Grossman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Grossman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade of service, Judge Grossman has seen his approval rates fluctuate. After starting his tenure with rates in the mid-30% range, he experienced a period of growth peaking at 57% in 2024 before settling at 46% in the most recent period. This trend indicates a judge whose decision-making has evolved over time. The recent data reflects a continuation of this varied pattern rather than a rigid, unchanging stance.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Grossman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Grossman? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York hearing office

The New York Hearing Office serves a large population in the New York region, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an active docket and a latest-period approval rate of 60%. You should expect a professional, evidence-focused environment where thorough documentation is essential. You can see the New York (New York) Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. Within the New York Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 37% to 82%. This variance highlights why understanding the general judicial environment is helpful for your preparation. The guidance for your case remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions